<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office 2010 Technical Preview now available</title>
	<atom:link href="http://projectdream.org/wordpress/2009/07/14/office-2010-technical-preview-now-available/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://projectdream.org/wordpress/2009/07/14/office-2010-technical-preview-now-available/</link>
	<description>The experiences of an SMB IT technician</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 20:09:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PAT Testing</title>
		<link>http://projectdream.org/wordpress/2009/07/14/office-2010-technical-preview-now-available/comment-page-1/#comment-3808</link>
		<dc:creator>PAT Testing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://projectdream.org/wordpress/?p=585#comment-3808</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d be interested to know how quick / smooth this is? I am running Office 2007 on my vista laptop, and it runs ok, but for overall speed I prefer Office 2003 on my old XP desktop (circa 2004) All the new features look nice, but I&#039;ve not yet found anything that I use on 2007 that I can&#039;t do on 2003.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to know how quick / smooth this is? I am running Office 2007 on my vista laptop, and it runs ok, but for overall speed I prefer Office 2003 on my old XP desktop (circa 2004) All the new features look nice, but I&#8217;ve not yet found anything that I use on 2007 that I can&#8217;t do on 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

